Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:49
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Capitol agenda: Thune heads into a perilous vote-a-rama - Politico
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ancient Blueprint For Human Bodies Discovered in Sea Anemones - ScienceAlert
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
There's no international protocol on what to do if an asteroid strikes Earth - theregister.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
What do you do when you are struggling to fall asleep?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What Happens to Your Blood Pressure When You Eat Grapefruit Every Day? - Verywell Health
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
AI Translation Of Smash Bros. Director's Comments About AI Misses Nuance, Sparks Outrage - Kotaku
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Adventure Calls from the Lost City of Un’Goro, Hearthstone’s Next Expansion - Blizzard Entertainment
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.